
% Table created by stargazer v.5.2.3 by Marek Hlavac, Social Policy Institute. E-mail: marek.hlavac at gmail.com
% Date and time: Thu, Jun 06, 2024 - 13:02:01
\begin{table}[!htbp] \centering 
  \caption{Replication of Table 3 using the binary measure of a belief} 
  \label{} 
\begin{tabular}{@{\extracolsep{5pt}}lcccc} 
\\[-1.8ex]\hline 
\hline \\[-1.8ex] 
 & \multicolumn{4}{c}{\textit{Dependent variable:}} \\ 
\cline{2-5} 
 & \multicolumn{2}{c}{Vote choice (-1/0/1)} & \multicolumn{2}{c}{Transfer offer (0/1)} \\ 
\\[-1.8ex] & (1) & (2) & (3) & (4)\\ 
\hline \\[-1.8ex] 
 cutoff1 & 3.887 & 3.609 &  &  \\ 
  & (4.027) & (4.109) &  &  \\ 
  & & & & \\ 
 cutoff2 & 5.699 & 5.438 &  &  \\ 
  & (4.039) & (4.120) &  &  \\ 
  & & & & \\ 
 Diff. in binary beliefs & 0.380 & 0.036 & $-$0.619 & $-$1.532 \\ 
  & (0.532) & (0.595) & (0.712) & (0.815) \\ 
  & & & & \\ 
 Private transfer offered & 3.650$^{**}$ & 3.231$^{**}$ &  &  \\ 
  & (0.387) & (0.487) &  &  \\ 
  & & & & \\ 
 Monitoring capacity &  &  & 2.004$^{**}$ & $-$0.074 \\ 
  &  &  & (0.383) & (0.639) \\ 
  & & & & \\ 
 Role in the first six rounds & $-$0.138 & $-$0.158 & $-$0.457 & $-$0.546 \\ 
  & (0.567) & (0.578) & (0.759) & (0.825) \\ 
  & & & & \\ 
 Age & 0.026 & 0.022 & $-$0.421 & $-$0.425 \\ 
  & (0.166) & (0.169) & (0.226) & (0.246) \\ 
  & & & & \\ 
 Female & 1.785$^{**}$ & 1.807$^{**}$ & $-$0.288 & $-$0.204 \\ 
  & (0.600) & (0.613) & (0.776) & (0.844) \\ 
  & & & & \\ 
 Christian & $-$0.438 & $-$0.437 & 0.316 & 0.221 \\ 
  & (0.660) & (0.673) & (0.843) & (0.914) \\ 
  & & & & \\ 
 Muslim & 0.972 & 1.036 & $-$0.841 & $-$0.867 \\ 
  & (0.867) & (0.887) & (1.181) & (1.284) \\ 
  & & & & \\ 
 Choice in the beauty contest & $-$0.009 & $-$0.009 & $-$0.015 & $-$0.019 \\ 
  & (0.013) & (0.014) & (0.018) & (0.020) \\ 
  & & & & \\ 
 Num. of correct answers in the CRT & $-$0.155 & $-$0.156 & 0.133 & 0.121 \\ 
  & (0.264) & (0.268) & (0.348) & (0.376) \\ 
  & & & & \\ 
 Altruism & $-$0.074 & $-$0.068 & 0.222 & 0.170 \\ 
  & (0.212) & (0.216) & (0.278) & (0.302) \\ 
  & & & & \\ 
 Positive reciprocity & 0.300 & 0.308 & 0.263 & 0.275 \\ 
  & (0.230) & (0.235) & (0.298) & (0.325) \\ 
  & & & & \\ 
 Round & 0.064 & 0.067 & $-$0.489$^{**}$ & $-$0.590$^{**}$ \\ 
  & (0.080) & (0.080) & (0.104) & (0.116) \\ 
  & & & & \\ 
 Diff. in binary beliefs X Transfer offered &  & 0.657 &  &  \\ 
  &  & (0.492) &  &  \\ 
  & & & & \\ 
 Diff. in binary beliefs X Monitoring capacity &  &  &  & 2.792$^{**}$ \\ 
  &  &  &  & (0.726) \\ 
  & & & & \\ 
 Constant &  &  & 8.940 & 10.405 \\ 
  &  &  & (5.369) & (5.855) \\ 
  & & & & \\ 
\hline \\[-1.8ex] 
Observations & 360 & 360 & 360 & 360 \\ 
Observations &  &  & 360 & 360 \\ 
Log Likelihood &  &  & $-$177.022 & $-$168.734 \\ 
Bayesian Inf. Crit. &  &  & 436.449 & 425.760 \\ 
\hline 
\hline \\[-1.8ex] 
\textit{Note:}  & \multicolumn{4}{l}{Models 1 to 4 use random effect regressions (ologit for Models 1 and 2 and logit for Models 3 and 4); standard errors in parentheses; cutoffs are suppressed in the report; * p<0.05, ** p<0.01} \\ 
\end{tabular} 
\end{table} 
